Oil subsidy removal and conflict in the Niger Delta: A tinderbox for the resurgence of militancy

Abstract

Historically it has been established that the Niger Delta region of Nigeria, has been exploited and marginalized despite being home to the nation’s oil rich reserves. This has made the region in the past to be the hotbed of conflict in the country, for many years. The policy of subsidy removal exacerbated a profound challenge in the region. While proponents argue for economic efficiency and resource allocation, critics fear that the resulting price increases will exacerbate existing socio-economic grievances, potentially triggering a resurgence of militancy. This paper examined the oil-related conflicts in the Niger Delta, analyzed the potential impact of subsidy removal on the region's residents, and argues that without comprehensive mitigation strategies, this policy could potentially reignite the long-simmering tensions and fuel a new wave of militancy. The study utilized a mixed-method approach to analyze the work. The study assessed the perception the people developed towards the policy and analyzed the impact of the removal on the people in the Niger Delta and its potential for resurging conflict in the area. Primary data was gathered through surveys and Key Informant Interviews, while the secondary data was gathered from various publications, media reports, scholarly articles and government reports. The findings provide valuable insight into the intricate relationship between the removal of the oil subsidy and conflict dynamics in the Niger Delta region and proffered evidence-based solution that will mitigate conflict and bring about sustainable peace and development in the region.